Top News
Next Story
Newszop

Arsenal set to face Man City accusation in emergency Premier League meeting

Send Push

Manchester City have written to the other 19 top-flight clubs to say the is “misleading” them - but the champions are unlikely to win over too many rivals after several were dragged into their legal dispute over sponsorship regulations.

Both City and the league claimed victory on Monday afternoon following an arbitration panel’s ruling that Associated Party Transaction rules are a required piece of governance but some elements of the current regulations are unlawful.

Yet the panel’s decision, , has dragged and among others into the saga because of an argument over loans from owners and shareholders.

A portion of the complex findings of three retired judges read: "MCFC alleges that there is a potential for distortion in this market by reason of the fact that the APT Rules do not apply to shareholder loans and will therefore incentivise shareholders to make loans as opposed to purchasing new equity, which favours clubs with better access to loans from shareholders.

READ MORE:

READ MORE:

"Those incentives could result in a material distortion, given that £1.5bn out of £4bn total borrowings (some 37%) are made to clubs by shareholders, including all of Arsenal’s borrowing and almost all of Brighton's borrowing."

And that is likely to make next week’s board meeting of clubs, which will discuss plans for reworked APT rules, all the more awkward.

The Premier League said "these elements can quickly and effectively be remedied by the league and clubs” - but it remains to be seen how the reworked APT will look.

It has been suggested that if shareholders are to lend money to their clubs in future they will need to carry interest rates comparable to standard lenders (presently 8-10%) and that will greatly impact clubs’ standing when it comes to Profit and Sustainability Rules.

However loans previously agreed are likely to remain untouched because there appears no precedent for new rules to be applied retroactively.

image

So instead of Arsenal paying future interest on pre-existing borrowing - which as of the end of 2023 was £259m - they are more likely to be blocked from receiving new loans from the club’s owners.

That adds another layer to a rivalry between the clubs that came close boiling over last month following a heated 2-2 draw. An added complication for the Premier League is that for any new rule to be implemented 14 of its clubs must be in favour.

The tribunal document also underlined . , and were named as being on City’s side of the argument, while Arsenal, Brighton, and provided evidence on behalf of the Premier League Of those not named the vast majority are expected to take the league’s side.

and receive your daily dose of Mirror Football content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our

Loving Newspoint? Download the app now